DEPARTMENTS: FINAL THOUGHT

    Huge Technology Investment is Not Short of Critics

    09/03/2019
    Ally Winning, European Editor, PSD

    As well as writing about technology, I try to keep up with the latest news from the sector. Personally, I’m more interested in the technology itself, rather than the business side of things, but I also try keep up with that side when I can. This month, one article caught my eye, in fact it made me do a double take. The article was in The Register, and if you don’t know the site itself, it’s an irreverent take on the tech world. The story focussed on the UK government’s recent announcement it was investing £250 million into the NHS for AI research.

    AI will be at the heart of medicine in the future. Most developed countries have both a shortage of doctors and an ageing population. In the not so distant future, AI will help take the pressure off doctors by taking care of tasks, such as performing diagnostic functions and assisting in operations. We are currently at the start of that journey and the time when AI takes over some of a doctor’s responsibilities may not be too far away, so it makes sense for the NHS, which cares for over 60 million people, to be involved in AI from the beginning.

    The reason I did a double take at the Register article was that medical professionals were slamming the investment. There is an argument that the cash may be needed more urgently elsewhere in the NHS, but investment in AI today could prove cheaper than buying solutions from others in the future. There’s no doubt that the NHS has been underfunded since the global financial crisis in 2008, and if politician’s promises are to believed, then there is more money in the pipeline for general medical use. That’s no real excuse to stop looking forward and trying to be at the forefront of future advances.

    Whether the government does end up making the investment or not, it does open up the question of what would be the UK’s science strategy after Brexit – if it ever happens. Both the country’s main rivals have very different science strategies. The EU has a collaborative approach, with the organisation funding universities, institutes and businesses to work together to solve problems. The US takes a more direct approach between businesses and academia. The NHS AI project may just be a preview of how the government sees the UK’s future science and technology strategy.

    If you are interested in the article, you can read it here:

    https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/08/12/medical_professionals_pour_cold_water_on_gov_250m_ai_plan/

    PSD

    www.powersystemsdesign.com

    Related

    AI and the Dark Web

    May 1,2026
    Jason Lomberg, North American Editor, PSD

    When Life Gives You Lemons

    May 1,2026
    Ally Winning, European Editor, PSD

    Is AI at Odds with Religion?

    Apr 1,2026
    Jason Lomberg, North America Editor, PSD

    Keeping the Lights on 24/7 Using Renewables

    Apr 1,2026
    Ally Winning, European Editor, PSD

    Power Systems Design

    146 Charles Street
    Annapolis, Maryland 21401 USA

    Power Systems Design

    Power Systems Design is a leading global media platform serving the power electronics design engineering community. It delivers in-depth technical content, industry news, and product insights to engineers and decision-makers developing advanced power systems and technologies.

    Published 12× per year across North America and Europe, Power Systems Design is distributed through online and fully digital editions, complemented by eNewsletters, webinars, and multimedia content. The platform covers key areas including power conversion, semiconductors, renewable energy, automotive electrification, AI power systems, and industrial applications—supporting innovation across the global electronics industry.