Editor Blogs

    Federal Panel Blames Tesla for Autopilot Fatal Crash

    03/02/2020
    Jason Lomberg, North American Editor, PSD
    Tag: @tesla #ev #electricvehicles #psd @NHTSAgov #autopilot
    Federal Panel Blames Tesla for Autopilot Fatal Crash
    A Tesla Model X similar to the one involved in the 2017 fatal crash.

    When I said that self-driving cars can’t save us from ourselves, a federal watchdog panel apparently agreed with me. On Tuesday, the National Transportation Safety Board blamed Tesla for a fatal 2018 crash involving its Autopilot “driver assistance” feature.

    Two years ago, a 2017 Tesla Model X on Autopilot slammed into a concrete highway barrier, killing the driver. The occupant, Apple engineer Walter Huang, was apparently playing a game on his phone, and logs showed that his hands were off the wheel 6 seconds prior to the crash.

    Of course, the Model X’s Autopilot “driver assistance” feature is just that – assistance. It’s not fully autonomous, and drivers are encouraged to maintain contact with the wheel. The Autopilot feature works by detecting pressure on the wheel, and it blares audio and visual warnings if contact is broken for too long.

    And just to add a weird twist, the Model X veered off the highway and actually sped up prior to the crash. We’ve highlighted before how autonomous and semi-autonomous cars could act too logical, picking the seemingly counterintuitive approach, divorced from messy human emotions. That might’ve been the case here, but we don’t know.

    The NTSB blamed Tesla for not doing enough to save us from ourselves and for the design of Autopilot. But the Tesla crash and the fatal incident involving an Uber self-driving car share one thing in common – a distracted driver (irrespective of the specific driver assistance features).

    The watchdog panel wanted automakers to further emphasize that driver assistance features aren’t fully autonomous, and they urged companies to research new ways to detect when people get distracted.

    I get that Autopilot and Uber’s “computer mode” can lull us into a sense of complacency, but short of literally taking control away from us, I’m not sure we can ever fix human nature.

    Recent
    Battery Life: How Can We Get More from Each Charge?

    Battery Life: How Can We Get More from Each Charge?

    04/12/2017
    Meng He, Executive Business Manager, Core Product Group, Maxim Integrated
     Creating Smaller, More Efficient Isolated Power Supplies with Iso-Buck Converters

    Creating Smaller, More Efficient Isolated Power Supplies with Iso-Buck Converters

    04/17/2017
    Reno Rossetti, Principal Technical Writer, Maxim Integrated
    Accelerating Isolated Power Supply Design

    Accelerating Isolated Power Supply Design

    05/10/2017
    Reno Rossetti, PhD, EE, Maxim Integrated
    The Pope Receives his First Electric Car

    The Pope Receives his First Electric Car

    06/02/2017
    Jason Lomberg, Editor, North America, PSD

    Power Systems Design

    146 Charles Street
    Annapolis, Maryland 21401 USA

    Power Systems Design

    Power Systems Design is a leading global media platform serving the power electronics design engineering community. It delivers in-depth technical content, industry news, and product insights to engineers and decision-makers developing advanced power systems and technologies.

    Published 12× per year across North America and Europe, Power Systems Design is distributed through online and fully digital editions, complemented by eNewsletters, webinars, and multimedia content. The platform covers key areas including power conversion, semiconductors, renewable energy, automotive electrification, AI power systems, and industrial applications—supporting innovation across the global electronics industry.