Editor Blogs

    Tesla Goes to War With the NTSB: Transparency vs. Radio Silence

    04/16/2018
    Jason Lomberg, North American Editor, PSD
    Tag: @Tesla @NTSB #TeslaModelX #autopilot #psd @ElonMusk #elonmusk

    The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has kicked Tesla off the board investigating the fatal crash of a car running Tesla’s “Autopilot.” Tesla claims they initiated the breakup. Self-interest aside, this sorry incident highlights the need for transparency with imperfect technology.

    Last month, a Tesla Model X SUV equipped with the Autopilot “driver-assistance system” slammed into a concrete divider, killing the driver. Autopilot, which helps the car stay within the lines and a safe distance from other vehicles, requires the driver to maintain contact with the steering wheel, and the system blares several audio and visual warnings if contact is broken for too long.

    Tesla maintained that the driver, Walter Huang, had no contact with the wheel for six seconds prior to the crash. The problem is that revealing this info violated Tesla’s agreement with the NTSB, which requires strict silence until its own investigation is concluded.

    On April 11, NTSB Chairman Robert Sumwalt noted on Twitter that, in a prior phone call with Tesla Chairman Elon Musk, he had “revoked Tesla's party status from the investigation.”

    The NTSB did so because "Tesla violated the party agreement by releasing investigative information before it was vetted and confirmed by the NTSB. Such releases of incomplete information often lead to speculation and incorrect assumptions about the probable cause of a crash...."

    Tesla released a statement on the same day claiming the following:

    “Today, Tesla withdrew from the party agreement with the NTSB because it requires that we not release information about Autopilot to the public, a requirement which we believe fundamentally affects public safety negatively,” the company said in a statement. “We believe in transparency, so an agreement that prevents public release of information for over a year is unacceptable.”

    Who dumped who seems irrelevant to me. Tesla was definitely covering its own posterior. Getting out ahead of the investigation is a great way to control public opinion. But they’re 100% right about the NTSB’s sluggish pace – the agency’s findings won’t be ready for a year or more, and a year in technology is an eternity.

    Tesla’s Autopilot feature is still on the roads, and withholding relevant safety information – i.e. “don’t break contact with the wheel” – is not within everyone’s best interests. The incident occurred because of a general unfamiliarity with a nascent technology – Autopilot is pretty far from a fully-autonomous driving system – and suppressing information for fear of comprising some investigation could have fatal consequences.

    Recent
    Company Shows off "Kung Fu Robot"

    Company Shows off "Kung Fu Robot"

    10/21/2026
    Jason Lomberg, North America Editor, PSD
    Honda Pushing Inductive Road Charging for EVs

    Honda Pushing Inductive Road Charging for EVs

    10/06/2026
    Jason Lomberg, North America Editor, PSD

    Power Systems Design

    146 Charles Street
    Annapolis, Maryland 21401 USA

    Power Systems Design

    Power Systems Design is a leading global media platform serving the power electronics design engineering community. It delivers in-depth technical content, industry news, and product insights to engineers and decision-makers developing advanced power systems and technologies.

    Published 12× per year across North America and Europe, Power Systems Design is distributed through online and fully digital editions, complemented by eNewsletters, webinars, and multimedia content. The platform covers key areas including power conversion, semiconductors, renewable energy, automotive electrification, AI power systems, and industrial applications—supporting innovation across the global electronics industry.