Click image to enlarge
Figure 1: Estimating Meeting
Early-stage project estimations form the foundation of any successful precision engineering project. The ability to forecast costs, timelines, and resource requirements can greatly impact the feasibility and efficiency of a project. However, the estimation process can be complicated, especially in the preliminary phases.
The Batten and Allen Project Estimation Tool helps facilitate the preliminary phase of a manufacturing project by providing customers with immediate cost estimates. The tool allows input of key information about the project, generating a preliminary price that can be modified within the tool until it meets the needs of the project. Although this is simply a guide, it opens the way for collaborative dialogue with Batten and Allen’s expert team, who can provide insight on materials, design, and tooling. This will eventually lead up to final and binding contract pricing. While only an approximate estimate, the Project Estimation Calculator helps set realistic expectations early on and contributes to successful project planning.
Evolving project scopes can be challenging within in precision engineering because, even minor adjustments, can have far-reaching effects on resource requirements, timelines, and costs. For example, a seemingly small change to a material specification could require entirely different MOQ’s, tools, or expertise, resulting in a longer lead time and increased production costs. Similarly, alterations in scope may demand additional testing or quality assurance processes, further extending the project timeline. One key issue with evolving scopes is that they often occur after budgets have been agreed, making it difficult to account for these changes without renegotiating terms or absorbing additional costs. To manage this, it’s essential to maintain flexibility in the early estimation process and build in contingencies. This not only ensures estimates remain as accurate as possible but also provides a buffer to absorb the impact of changes without severely disrupting the project.
Click image to enlarge
Figure 2: Estimation Tool
Precision engineering has undergone significant transformation in recent years, largely driven by technological advances. These developments have not only enhanced the engineering process but have also changed how early-stage project estimations are approached. Traditional estimation methods, often reliant on experience and manual calculations, have given way to more sophisticated tools that provide a high level of accuracy. Estimation software now offers advanced capabilities, enabling engineers to break down project components in detail, providing insights previously difficult to obtain manually. For example, computer-aided design and modelling software not only help engineers design intricate components but also offer the ability to simulate the manufacturing process. This allows project teams to gauge how long specific processes will take, what materials will be needed, and which bottlenecks could arise. Moreover, project management software tools that integrate with estimation processes further enhance efficiency. These tools allow teams to enter variables, such as material costs, labour rates, and lead times. Adjustments can be made in real-time as new data becomes available, enabling estimations to be updated dynamically.
Click image to enlarge
Figure 3: Cam Design
Precision engineering projects are inherently complex, involving highly detailed designs, exacting standards, and intricate production processes. These factors make early project estimations particularly challenging. However, the wealth of data accumulated from previous projects offers a critical resource that can enhance the accuracy of forecasts for new projects. By leveraging this, estimators can identify patterns, anticipate challenges, and base their projections on real-world performance. In precision engineering, estimates based on theoretical models or industry averages can fall short of the mark. By contrast, historical data offers insights grounded in actual project performance, which makes it an indispensable tool for developing more reliable forecasts. For example, data from previous projects can help predict how long a specific machining process will take or how much material will be needed, reducing the risk of underestimating project scope.
Click image to enlarge
Figure 4: Exploded Tool Image
To create reliable estimates, it is essential to incorporate input from multiple teams, particularly engineering, procurement, and finance, ensuring a comprehensive and realistic view of the project’s requirements. From an engineering perspective, the technical complexities of the project need to be fully understood and communicated. Engineers have detailed knowledge of the technical specifications, processes, and potential challenges that could arise during production. Their insights help ensure estimators can account for the intricacies of design and manufacturing, such as material selection, machining tolerances, and the time required for testing and quality assurance. Without engineering input, the project estimate risks being overly simplistic, failing to capture the detailed scope of the work involved. Procurement teams, on the other hand, play a crucial role in understanding the cost and availability of materials, which are often subject to market fluctuations or supply chain disruptions. Their knowledge of supplier relationships, lead times, and pricing dynamics is invaluable in ensuring that material costs are accurately forecasted. Procurement’s input also helps to identify any potential risks related to material shortages or price increases, allowing for more informed contingency planning. Meanwhile, the finance department offers a broader perspective on the project’s budgetary constraints and financial goals. By incorporating their input, the estimation process can be aligned with the overall financial strategy of the company. Finance teams can also help ensure any risks associated with fluctuating costs or potential delays are factored into the estimate, preventing cost overruns and ensuring the project remains viable. This holistic approach not only improves the accuracy of cost and time forecasts but also ensures all departments are aligned in their understanding of the project’s objectives and constraints.
Click image to enlarge
Figure 5: Technical Review
It’s critical the project scope, including all requirements, technical specifications, and limitations, is communicated clearly and consistently to everyone involved. The best way to achieve this is through structured communication channels, such as regular project meetings, detailed scope documents, and collaborative planning sessions. These forums allow all stakeholders to come together, share their views, and raise any concerns they may have. Engineers can clarify technical requirements, procurement can provide updates on material availability, and finance can ensure the estimate aligns with budgetary constraints. It is also important to establish a feedback loop where questions can be addressed promptly and any changes to the project scope are communicated immediately. In addition, establishing clear definitions of roles and responsibilities helps prevent information gaps or overlap. Each department needs to understand not only what is expected of them but also how their input fits into the larger estimation process. Clear responsibility assignments can avoid miscommunication and ensure that each team is held accountable for providing the necessary data in a timely and accurate manner.
As projects progress, ongoing monitoring of key project metrics is essential. Even the best preliminary estimates can become outdated if they are not continually revisited & adjusted in response to new developments. Continuous monitoring allows project teams to track progress against the original estimate & make informed decisions about any necessary adjustments. To ensure estimations remain relevant, project managers & estimators should implement regular check-ins & reviews throughout the project lifecycle. These reviews provide an opportunity to assess how well the project is adhering to the initial forecast & identify any deviations that may require revisions.
Click image to enlarge
Figure 6: Engineering Review
Feedback reviews provide an opportunity to assess how well the estimation process aligned with real-world outcomes and to identify areas where improvements can be made. For example, if the project consistently exceeded the estimated timeline, the review process may reveal that certain tasks were underestimated in terms of complexity or resource requirements. This information can then be used to refine future estimates. In addition to formal post project reviews, feedback loops should also operate throughout the project lifecycle.
Click image to enlarge
Figure 7: Tool Plan
Continuous improvement should be embedded in the company’s values and operational framework, with employees at all levels encouraged to contribute ideas for enhancing processes. Open communication, cross functional collaboration, and shared learning are key components of this culture, ensuring improvements in estimation are driven by a collective effort.
Click image to enlarge
Figure 8: Improvements
We are excited to announce our new collaboration with NDC International who will be representing us in North America going forwards. Please contact NDC International for technical and commercial support, and details of how Batten & Allen can support you in North America.
Please visit our website to try our project calculator, to find out more about Batten & Allen, and to contact us for further discussion of your unique project needs. We look forward to meeting you to discuss face to face on Booth 318 at APEC, Atlanta.
PDF